“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications, whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years……It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government.”  David Rockefeller – Bilderberg Group meeting in Baden-Baden, Germany in June 1991.

Learning to Listen 

For many years now, full disclosure of these plans has sat just a click away from the cute kittens on YouTube. If only people had stopped to do some research before they brought the entire world to its knees. Instead, people worship false idols and happily take instructions from the biggest criminals on this planet today.  

All they needed was consent, and they got the resounding compliance from nearly every man and woman, across the entire world.  

All they wanted to know was could they – the (w)bankers and Governments, steal everything you own (even your body), right under your nose?  

Could they persuade you to inject an untested, un-researched concoction of poison into your veins without you asking a single question?  

The answer again seems to be an astonishing YES. 

People will even shut down their businesses, cover their faces in shame and even kneel to demonstrate their compliance.  

The mainstream media, Boris Johnson, Matt Hancock have already told you people are dying ‘WITH’ the Coronavirus and not ‘OF’ the Coronavirus. And they are not actually lying.   

If you have ever had the common cold you will have coronavirus present in your body. So are people dying WITH Coronavirus?   

YES. Because we all will.   

The mainstream media, Boris Johnson, Matt Hancock have already told you that:

The tests have been contaminated with the Coronavirus.

The tests give 80% false positive results.

Car oil will even tested positive for Coronavirus.

The Coronavirus is not a life-threatening disease

They told you, and they told you, and they told you. But you heard something different. 

We have to wake people from their hypnotic trance and demand they destroy their Tell-Lie-Visions. This is the only way to get rid of the NOVEL Coronavirus Plandemic. 

Full Disclosure 

A World at Risk Global Preparedness Monitoring Board

 Page 39 – Progress indicator(s) by September 2020  

  • The Secretary-General of the United Nations, with the Director-General of WHO and Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs, strengthens coordination and identifies clear roles and responsibilities and timely triggers for a coordinated United Nations system wide response for health emergencies in different countries and different health and humanitarian emergency contexts.
  • The United Nations (including WHO) conducts at least two system wide training and simulation exercises, including one covering the deliberate release of a lethal respiratory pathogen.
  • WHO develops intermediate triggers to mobilize national, international and multilateral action early in outbreaks, to complement the existing mechanisms for later and more advanced stages of an outbreak under the IHR (2005).
  • The Secretary General of the United Nations convenes a high-level dialogue with health, security and foreign affairs officials to determine how the world can address the threat of a lethal respiratory pathogen pandemic, as well as managing preparedness for disease outbreaks in complex, insecure contexts. Progress, challenges, actions: international coordination mechanisms.

Event 201  


Ultimate objectives:  

There is no ambiguity or delay in the United Nations system wide response to a global health emergency. There are clear rules, roles and responsibilities, along with a designated leader, empowered with the authority to coordinate across the system and experienced in leading a global response through regular simulations or actual events. WHO can rapidly mobilize countries and partners early in an outbreak or health emergency.    

The organisations involved are Logica, the International Federation of Red Cross, and Red Crescent Societies independent oversight advisory committee for the WHO Health Emergencies program. Johns Hopkins University Center for Health Security, University of Oxford, Chatham House, Wellcome Trust, and the World Health Organization, and the World Bank Group.   

The Event 201 was a pandemic exercise, conducted on October 18, 2019, just a few months before we went into a live drill, sorry, slip of the tongue we went into the NOVEL Coronavirus Pandemic.  

Event 201 simulates an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen and the disease it causes are modeled largely on SARS, but it is more transmissible in the community setting by people with mild symptoms. 

Event 201 was a 3.5-hour pandemic tabletop exercise that simulated a series of dramatic, scenario-based facilitated discussions, confronting difficult, true-to-life dilemmas associated with response to a hypothetical, but scientifically plausible, pandemic. 15 global business, government, and public health leaders were players in the simulation exercise that highlighted unresolved real-world policy and economic issues that could be solved with sufficient political will, financial investment, and attention now and in the future.The exercise consisted of pre-recorded news broadcasts, live “staff” briefings, and moderated discussions on specific topics. These issues were carefully designed in a compelling narrative that educated the participants and the audience. The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation jointly propose these recommendations. 

ROCKEFELLER foundation – Scenarios for the Future of Technology & International Development (2014) 

Lock Step (Lock Down)

A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback

Written as a Novel, a simulation of a real life-event:  

Page 18 – In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009’s H1N1, this new influenza strain—originating from wild geese—was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20% of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.  

The pandemic blanketed the planet—though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols. But even in developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’ initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. However, a few countries did fare better—China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery. 

China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems—from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty—leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.  

Page 19 – At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty—and their privacy—to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: bio-metric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth. 

Across the developing world, however, the story was different—and much more variable. 

The top-down authority took different forms in different countries, hinging largely on the capacity, calibre, and intentions of their leaders. In countries with strong and thoughtful leaders, citizens’ overall economic status and quality of life increased. In India, for example, air quality drastically improved after 2016, when the government outlawed high emitting vehicles. In Ghana, the introduction of ambitious government programs to improve basic infrastructure and ensure the availability of clean water for all her people led to a sharp decline in water-borne diseases. But more authoritarian leadership worked less well—and in some cases tragically—in countries run by irresponsible elites who used their increased power to pursue their own interests at the expense of their citizens. 

They say ‘To be clear, the Center for Health Security and partners did not make a prediction during our tabletop exercise. For the scenario, we modeled a fictional coronavirus pandemic, but we explicitly stated that it was not a prediction. Instead, the exercise served to highlight preparedness and response challenges that would likely arise in a very severe pandemic.‘.  

What an amazing coincidence!

 Hollywood – Contagion (2011)


  • Marion Cotillard
  • Matt Damon
  • Laurence Fishburne
  • Jude Law
  • Gwyneth Paltrow
  • Kate Winslet
  • Bryan Cranston
  • Jennifer Ehle
  • Sanaa Lathan

Hollywood gave you the full disclosure to their plans, back in 2011 when it released the film, Contagion. It was a star-studded line up including the actor Laurence Fishburne, who played Morpheus in the Matrix film trilogy.  


Returning from a Hong Kong business trip, Beth Emhoff meets with a former lover during a Chicago layover. Two days later, back home in suburban Minneapolis, she collapses with seizures. Her husband, Mitch Emhoff, rushes her to the hospital, but she dies of an unknown cause. Returning home, Mitch finds that his stepson, Clark, has also died. Mitch is isolated but found to be naturally immune; after being released, Mitch protectively keeps his teenage daughter, Jory, quarantined at their house.

In Atlanta, Department of Homeland Security representatives meet with Dr. Ellis Cheever of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention over concerns that the disease may be a bioweapon. Cheever dispatches Dr. Erin Mears, an Epidemic Intelligence Service officer, to Minneapolis where she traces everyone who had contact with Beth. She negotiates with reluctant local bureaucrats to commit resources for a public health response. Soon after, Mears becomes infected and dies. As the novel virus spreads, several cities are placed under quarantine, causing wide-spread looting and violence. 

At the CDC, Dr. Ally Hextall determines the virus is a combination of genetic material from pig and bat-borne viruses. Research on a cure stalls because scientists are unable to discover a cell culture within which to grow the newly identified MEV-1. Dr. Cheever determines the virus too virulent to be researched at multiple labs and restricts all work to one government site. Dr. Hextall orders University of California researcher Dr. Ian Sussman to destroy his samples. Believing he is close to finding a viable cell culture, Sussman violates Cheever’s order and eventually identifies a usable MEV-1 cell culture using bat cells, from which Hextall develops a vaccine. Other scientists determine the virus is spread by respiratory droplets and fomites, with a basic reproduction number of four when the virus mutates; they project that 1 in 12 of the world population will be infected, with a 25–30% mortality rate. 

Conspiracy theorist Alan Krumwiede posts videos about the virus on his blog. In one video, he claims to have cured himself of the virus using a homeopathic cure derived from forsythia. People seeking forsythia overwhelm pharmacies, turning violent when limited supplies run out. During a television interview, Krumwiede discloses that Cheever secretly warned his fiancée to leave Chicago before quarantine was declared. Cheever is informed he will be investigated. Krumwiede, having faked being infected to boost sales of forsythia, is arrested for conspiracy and securities fraud. 

Using an attenuated virus, Hextall identifies a potential vaccine. To expedite the vaccine development, Hexall bypasses the informed consent test subject process. She instead inoculates herself with the experimental vaccine, then visits her infected father. She does not contract MEV-1 and the vaccine is declared a success. The CDC awards vaccinations by lottery based on birthdates. By this time, the death toll has reached 2.5 million in the U.S. and 26 million worldwide. 

Earlier in Hong Kong, World Health Organization epidemiologist Dr. Leonora Orantes and public health officials comb through security video tapes of Beth’s contacts in a Macau casino and identify her as the index case. Government official Sun Feng kidnaps Orantes as leverage to obtain MEV-1 vaccine doses for his village, holding her for months. WHO officials provide the village with earliest vaccines and Orantes is released. When she learns the vaccines were placebos, she runs to warn the village. 

In a flashback to the spillover event, a bulldozer razes palm trees while clearing a rainforest in China, disturbing some bats’ natural habitat. One bat finds shelter in a pig farm and drops an infected piece of banana, which is eaten by a pig. The pig is slaughtered and prepared by a chef in a Macau casino, who transmits the virus to Beth via a handshake.

At this point it is worth noting that films are not created for your entertainment. The purpose they serve most importantly is to give disclosure and advertising for their agendas. 

Please note Laurence Fishburne at 1 hour 14 seconds of the film Contagion states; 

“Homeland Security wants to know if they can put the vaccination in the water supply. Like Fluoride; cure everyone all at once” 

Dr Hextall replies. I am going home now, Merry Christmas. Dr Ellis Cheever (Laurence Fishburne) replies Merry Christmas. Are they telling us something here?   

Now a vaccination was patented for the Coronavirus back in 2005, by the Pirbright Institute Coronavirus Patent EP3172319B1 2015-07-23   

It is worth pointing out that The Pirbright Institute (formerly the Institute for Animal Health) is a research institute in Surrey, England, dedicated to the study of infectious diseases of farm animals. It forms part of the UK government’s Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)  

The Coronavirus Patent EP3172319B1 (2015) states:  

The method of administration of the vaccine may be selected from the group consisting of; eye drop administration, intranasal administration, drinking water administration, post-hatch injection and in ovo injection.   

Lists of patents for the Coronavirus from Justia Patents are;    

US Patent Application for Anti-coronavirus drug Patent Application (Application #20060223847 issued October 5, 2006)

US Patent Application for Anti-coronavirus vaccine Patent Application (Application #20050053622 issued March 10, 2005)

US Patent Application for BROAD-SPECTRUM NON-COVALENT CORONAVIRUS PROTEASE INHIBITORS Patent Application (Application# 20170313685 issued 28th April 2017)

US Patent Application for COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR CORONAVIRUS INHIBITION (Application #20140045743 issued February 13, 2014)

US Patent Application for Coronavirus Patent Application (Application #20170216427 issued August 3, 2017)

US Patent Application for METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR CORONAVIRUS DIAGNOSTICS AND THERAPEUTICS Patent Application (Application #20160238601 issued August 18, 2016)

US Patent for Compositions and methods for coronavirus inhibition Patent (Patent # 9,056,900 issued June 16, 2015)

US Patent for Compositions and methods for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus Patent (Patent # 7,129,042 issued October 31, 2006)

US Patent CORONAVIRUS ISOLATED FROM HUMANS (Patent #7,220,852 B1 issued May 22, 2007